Índice
─ Enlaces y presentación
─ Nota sobre cáncer, Jesús y Hamer
___
Enlaces y presentación
En este vídeo:
… enlaces:
─ YT:
https://youtube.com/live/EZOxRe_z5CM
─ Para descargar:
https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/8e2n9v8qvoph3rs54a1m1/20241014-Enfermedades-que-surgen-porque-aumenta-nuestra-sensibilidad-a-resistencia.mp4
… vemos una parte del vídeo original de Jesús y María Magdalena, que enlazo a continuación:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k6dRcPEVpWI
20241026 1100 DT Living Room Tour US event 12 Day2 Part1
(Vemos desde minuto 1.36.50 al 1.50.51)
____
Nota sobre cáncer, Jesús y Hamer (un recordatorio a cuento de este reciente vídeo de Jesús y María M.)
Supongo que muchos conocéis la figura de Ryke Geerd Hamer, que descubrió con mucha precisión la relación entre el conflicto que sufre la persona, y dónde se desarrolla el cáncer (y un fenómeno que aparece siempre matemáticamente en el cerebro, en un escáner cerebral ─aparece en los mismos puntos en ese escáner, dependiendo de cómo es el cáncer─).
Me resulta curioso que Hamer no apareció en ninguna pregunta todavía, de las que vi en los materiales de DT (pude ir a Irlanda esta vez, por cierto, pero no hay mucha oportunidad de hacer preguntas, pues ya sabéis, somos muchos).
La visión que nos da Jesús con sus leyes es lógicamente más amplia, abarcante.
Por ejemplo, tenemos un evento que quizá diríamos que es paradigmático a la hora de explicar el descubrimiento de Hamer: es lo que le pasó a él y a su mujer con su hijo; éste recibió una bala accidentalmente, en unas vacaciones, y por la cual terminó muriendo.
Eso desató un «conflicto emocional» (aunque a Hamer no le gustaba tratar de emociones directamente, al menos como concepto ─era muy cientifista a su manera, aunque fue perseguido por la corriente mainstream, claro está, ya que es un descubrimiento muy bueno).
El conflicto, al tener que ver con «hijos» ─al sentirlo así ellos dos─ hizo desarrollar cánceres en ambos progenitores. Los cánceres tuvieron que ver con los órganos de la reproducción sexual (y ya sabemos… es que así actúan nuestras «falsas creencias» sobre «ser padres, sobre tener que serlo, sobre necesitar serlo, etc.)
Y por supuesto, la visión más abarcante y simple para empezar es, sobre ese caso, que Hamer no quería saber (tal como nosotros no queremos saber, en general) que el alma atrae también los accidentes, en general.
Es decir, que Hamer y su pareja habían atraído por algún motivo ese homicidio, en un primer lugar; y que eso, una vez sucedido, si queremos crecer, lo hemos de sentir y considerar como un regalo para «sentir el error» que ya está en nuestra alma ─ese error que causa esos accidentes─, y así poder sustituirlo por creencias verdaderas (ayudando así más aún a todas las personas involucradas, también las accidentadas, que en este caso no murieron de inmediato, no murió el joven, no de inmediato, si es que recuerdo bien el caso).
___
About «cancer»…:
I guess many of you know the figure of Ryke Geerd Hamer, who discovered very precisely the relationship between the conflict that the person suffers, and where the cancer develops (and a phenomenon that always appears mathematically in the brain, in a brain scan ─ it appears in the same points in that scan, depending on how the cancer is─).
I find it curious that Hamer did not appear in any questions yet, of the ones I saw in the DT materials (I was able to go to Ireland this time, by the way, but there is not much opportunity to ask questions, as you know, there are many of us).
The vision that Jesus gives us is logically broader, encompassing.
For example, we have an event that perhaps we would say is paradigmatic when it comes to explaining Hamer’s discovery: it is what happened to him and his wife with their son; the latter accidentally received a bullet, on a vacation, and from which he ended up dying.
That triggered an «emotional conflict» (although Hamer did not like to deal with emotions directly, at least as a concept ─he was very scientistic in his own way, although he was persecuted by the mainstream, of course, as it is a very good discovery).
The conflict, having to do with “children” ─as they both felt all the thing that way─ caused cancers to develop in both parents. The cancers had to do with the organs of sexual reproduction (and we know… that’s how our “false beliefs” about “being parents, about having to be parents, about needing to be parents, etc., work).
And of course, the most comprehensive and simple view to begin with is, about that case, that Hamer did not want to know (just as we do not want to know, in general) that the soul also attracts the accidents, when these things happen, in general.
That is, that Hamer and his partner had attracted for some reason that homicide, in the first place; and that that, once it happened, we have to feel and consider it ─if we want to grow─ as a gift to “feel the error” that is already in our soul ─that error that causes those accidents─, and thus be able to replace it with true beliefs (thus helping even more all the people involved, also the injured, who in this case did not die immediately ─ the son did not die immediately, if I remember the case well).
___
Segunda parte de la nota:
En el minuto 1:26:47 de este vídeo:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PKh1djyuCow , Jesús dice esto:
«The dynamic is… you want a specific emotion from other people, and you’re willing to work hard in a certain way to get it from the other person so you don’t have to feel the opposite emotion yourself…»
And then…
As for cancer, at first it seems difficult to reconcile the «biological sense of disease» ─something Hamer «discovered»─ with this perspective.
Maybe Hamer’s perspective would be a sort of an extreme stage of a certain «materialistic» bio─idolatry.
But perhaps it can be reconciled in some manner.
The lack of «energetic harmonic flow» ─so to speak─ in the biological body (caused by the corresponding soul blockage, transmitted to the spirit and physical bodies) could perhaps be considered as causing a kind of «bio-regression».
Then the affected part functions to provide a solution of its own (that has its logic). For example, Hamer asserted that lung cancer would be part of a bio─program, a bio─program that would consist in making the lungs bigger in order to be able to breathe more (as a logical response to a threat to our life, some threat we see as such). Then the «logical» bio─program is to make more lungs to be able to run faster from the threat. Then the tissue grows, and then it happens a process involving viruses, etc., that contribute to eliminate the abnormal growth, and voila, we have bigger and also healthy lungs.
Before I found DT, I thought that the cancer only caused deaths because of a persistent «emotional conflict» and also because the allopathic medicine fights the very same particles (viruses, etc.) that are essential for the termination of the process, which in itself would be only a programme and does not have to be dramatic at all.
So, the deaths (that’s the Hamer’s thinking more or less)… the deaths would be caused by the ignorance of this great discovery of Hamer about the conflicts that triggered the cancer and other sicknesses (it is nevertheless a great discovery, because he found great correlations between: organ ─ type of conflict ─ part of the brain)… and also the deaths, as I said, would be caused by the allopatic bad treatment of:
─ our complex body, seen as an ecosystem (in which viruses, bacteria, etc. simply and generally function under programmes whose aim is to heal the body, that is, to complete the process ─in various phases─ discovered in Hamer’s findings),
─ and the bad treatment of the process, in the sense that the process would be a programmed one, associated with the body, and having a biological meaning.